[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":167},["ShallowReactive",2],{"live-categories":3,"article-tradingview-dca-martingale":34,"related-tradingview-dca-martingale":71,"cat-name-strategies":158},{"categories":4},[5,11,15,19,23,26,30],{"slug":6,"sort":7,"name":8,"description":9,"metaTitle":9,"metaDescription":9,"articles":10},"risk-management",1,"Risk Management",null,2,{"slug":12,"sort":10,"name":13,"description":9,"metaTitle":9,"metaDescription":9,"articles":14},"prop-firms","Prop Firms",5,{"slug":16,"sort":17,"name":18,"description":9,"metaTitle":9,"metaDescription":9,"articles":10},"tradingview",3,"Tradingview",{"slug":20,"sort":21,"name":22,"description":9,"metaTitle":9,"metaDescription":9,"articles":17},"mt5",4,"Mt5",{"slug":24,"sort":14,"name":25,"description":9,"metaTitle":9,"metaDescription":9,"articles":7},"crypto-exchanges","Crypto Exchanges",{"slug":27,"sort":28,"name":29,"description":9,"metaTitle":9,"metaDescription":9,"articles":7},"strategies",6,"Strategies",{"slug":31,"sort":32,"name":33,"description":9,"metaTitle":9,"metaDescription":9,"articles":7},"comparisons",7,"Comparisons",{"id":35,"status":36,"publishedAt":37,"updatedAt":37,"author":38,"authorSlug":39,"coverId":9,"coverUrl":9,"ogImageUrl":9,"languageCode":40,"slug":41,"title":42,"excerpt":43,"body":44,"metaTitle":45,"metaDescription":46,"readingTime":47,"headings":48,"category":27,"midCtaAfterBlock":70},"6379d2da-30b0-4439-8363-e86f43693769","published","2026-10-15T08:43:00.000Z","Michael Novik","michael-novik","en-US","tradingview-dca-martingale","TradingView Alert to DCA or Martingale: The Real Numbers","One setting turns a DCA ladder into a Martingale ladder. Here's what each costs at eight rungs, what bounce gets you out, and which limit actually stops it.","\u003Cp>Every page selling a Martingale bot shows you the exit. The ladder goes underwater, the average entry drops, price bounces half a percent, the whole thing closes green. What none of them shows is the size of the position at the moment of that bounce.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Here are the numbers, side by side with DCA, because they're the same ladder with one setting changed.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>A DCA ladder and a Martingale ladder are the same thing: a sequence of entries at set price intervals, closed together at one take-profit above the average entry. The only difference is the multiplier. At 1, every rung is the same size, which is DCA. At 2, every rung doubles, which is Martingale. At eight rungs, doubling needs a 1.5% bounce to exit where equal sizing needs 4.1%, and it holds 32 times the exposure to get it. The limit that stops either one is max drawdown, not daily loss.\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-0\">What a ladder actually is\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>A signal fires and the first order opens. Price falls a set distance, and a second order opens below it. It falls again, a third. Every rung lowers the ladder's average entry, so the price it needs to climb back to in order to close in profit gets nearer with each one.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>All rungs share one take-profit, set a fixed percentage above the average entry, and the whole ladder closes together when price reaches it. There's no stop-loss on the rungs. The ladder either reaches its take-profit, or you close it, or a risk limit closes it.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>That last sentence is the whole subject of this article.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-1\">One setting, two strategies\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Here's a ladder with eight rungs, entries 1% apart starting at 100, and a take-profit 0.5% above the average. The first order is one unit.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"min-width: 75px;\">\u003Ccolgroup>\u003Ccol style=\"min-width: 25px;\">\u003Ccol style=\"min-width: 25px;\">\u003Ccol style=\"min-width: 25px;\">\u003C\u002Fcolgroup>\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Multiplier 2 (Martingale)\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Multiplier 1 (DCA)\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Rung sizes\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Total exposure\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>255 × the first order\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>8 × the first order\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Deepest entry\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>93.21\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>93.21\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Average entry\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>94.13\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>96.57\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Take-profit\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>94.60\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>97.05\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Bounce needed from the deepest rung\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>+1.5%\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>+4.1%\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp>Read the last two rows together. Doubling pulls the average entry down to within a point of the deepest rung, so a 1.5% bounce closes the ladder in profit. Equal sizing leaves the average three points higher, so the bounce has to be 4.1%, nearly three times as far.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Now read the second row. The doubling ladder bought that easier exit with 255 units of exposure against 8. If the first order was 1% of your balance, the doubling ladder at depth eight holds 255% of the balance in position value, and every further 1% drop costs about 2.5% of the balance. The DCA ladder holds 8% and loses about 0.08% per further 1% drop.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Martingale isn't a cleverer DCA. It's a bet that price bounces 1.5% before it falls another few percent, made with everything you have.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cfigure>\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Fmedia\u002F462c0e4e-0290-4da9-8087-9673e9372a23-e8fd42e2.webp\" alt=\"Dca Vs Martingale Ladder Exposure\" loading=\"lazy\">\u003Cfigcaption>Same eight entries, same prices. Doubling pulls the take-profit down to 94.60, just above the deepest rung; equal sizing leaves it at 97.05, at a cost of 255× the first order against 8×.\u003C\u002Ffigcaption>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-2\">What you set, and what each setting does to the maths\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>On a Vectorhelm Martingale strategy the ladder is defined by a short list, and each item changes the table above.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul>\u003Cli>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Direction.\u003C\u002Fstrong> Long or short. A hedging account can run one of each on the same symbol, as two strategies.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>First order size.\u003C\u002Fstrong> A fixed amount or a percent of balance. Everything scales from this.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Multiplier.\u003C\u002Fstrong> Each rung is the previous one times this. 1 is DCA. 2 is doubling. 1.5 is between: eight rungs total about 49 times the first order, with the average entry and the bounce landing between the two columns above.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Price step.\u003C\u002Fstrong> The minimum distance between entries, in percent. Wider steps mean a deeper ladder covers more price for the same number of rungs, and a larger loss at the bottom.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Max steps.\u003C\u002Fstrong> The number of rungs. This is where the exposure is decided. Doubling to eight rungs is 255×; to ten it's 1,023×.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Take-profit.\u003C\u002Fstrong> Percent above the ladder's average entry, shared by every rung.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>What starts the ladder.\u003C\u002Fstrong> A TradingView alert, builder conditions, or always.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Cooldown.\u003C\u002Fstrong> An optional pause before a new ladder can start after one closes.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>When a risk limit fires.\u003C\u002Fstrong> Keep the open ladder with its take-profit, or close it.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp>Three of those settings decide the exposure between them: first order size, multiplier and max steps. Vectorhelm doesn't work the ladder out for you, so do it before you launch, the way the table above does. Multiply the first order by the multiplier for each rung, add them up, and ask whether you'd hold that total at the deepest entry. If you wouldn't, lower max steps or the multiplier until you would. \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.notion.so\u002Fplatform\u002Fexecution-modes\u002F\">Execution modes\u003C\u002Fa> covers how the four modes differ.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cfigure>\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Fmedia\u002F5f48d3e3-3596-4cfa-bf4b-7a37f736e87f-8ed1b335.webp\" alt=\"Vectorhelm Martingale Strategy Settings\" loading=\"lazy\">\u003Cfigcaption>The three settings that decide exposure: first order size, multiplier and max steps. Everything in the table above follows from these.\u003C\u002Ffigcaption>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-3\">What the next alert does while a ladder is open\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>A Martingale strategy takes open signals in its direction, and nothing else. There's no close signal for a ladder; it closes at its take-profit.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>An open signal while the ladder is already open adds a rung, but only if price has moved at least the step distance from the last entry. If it hasn't, the signal is recorded and skipped. That's what stops a script alerting on every bar from stacking five positions at the same price. Above max steps, the signal is refused and the refusal is logged with that reason.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>If you close one rung by hand, the ladder carries on with the rest, and the take-profit is recomputed from the remaining average.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-4\">The limit that actually stops a ladder\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>This is the part that catches people, and it's worth being precise.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>A daily loss limit counts closed trades. A ladder that's eight rungs deep and 15% underwater has closed nothing, so the daily loss limit sees nothing. It will not fire. The same is true of any tool that measures loss on realized P&L only.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>The limit that sees an open ladder is \u003Cstrong>max drawdown\u003C\u002Fstrong>, measured from peak equity, because equity includes the floating loss. Set at the strategy level, it stops that ladder at the depth you chose. Set at the account level, it stops everything on the account, which is the right call when the ladder is one of several strategies sharing a balance.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Depth is also capped twice: by the ladder's own max steps, and by the strategy's max open positions limit. The lower one wins. A ladder with max steps at ten and max open positions at six stops at six.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>So the honest configuration for a Martingale strategy is three numbers, not one. Max steps sets how deep it can go. Max drawdown sets how much it can lose on the way, floating loss included. And the account's max drawdown sits above both, in case the ladder isn't the only thing having a bad day. The ladder has no stop-loss of its own. The limits are the stop.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cfigure>\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Fmedia\u002F0b4e11ef-d51b-4165-959a-53c217f9b38f-b2f5a7c9.webp\" alt=\"Vectorhelm Strategy Risk Limits Max Drawdown\">\u003Cfigcaption>Max drawdown is the limit that sees an open ladder. Daily loss counts closed trades only and never fires on a ladder that’s still underwater.\u003C\u002Ffigcaption>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-5\">The honest limitation\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>A ladder with a stop is a strategy with a stop. The appeal of Martingale is that it never takes the loss, and a max drawdown limit takes it for you, at the depth you set, on a day that might have bounced.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>That's the trade. Without the limit, the ladder's loss is bounded only by the account, and the table above shows how fast that bound arrives at eight rungs doubling. With the limit, some ladders get closed that would have recovered. There's no setting that gives you the recovery without the risk, and any tool suggesting there is has left a row out of its table.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>On a funded account, the arithmetic is worse than it looks here, because the firm's drawdown rule is measured on equity too. A doubling ladder that's 5% underwater on a 10% max drawdown rule has used half the account's life on one trade idea. Most firms also name martingale specifically in their rules, so read yours before the first ladder opens.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-6\">Before you run one\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp>Work out the total exposure at max steps for your first order size and multiplier, and decide whether you'd hold that position at the deepest entry. If not, lower max steps or the multiplier until you would.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Set max drawdown on the strategy. Then set it on the account.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>Run it on demo through at least one losing stretch, not just the bounce.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp>\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.notion.so\u002Fearly-access\u002F\">Join the waitlist\u003C\u002Fa>. It's free, needs no card, and your invitation comes with a \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.notion.so\u002Fplatform\u002Fdemo-accounts\u002F\">demo account\u003C\u002Fa> running the full risk engine. Build a ladder from a TradingView alert, set the drawdown limit, and watch it close the ladder before it closes the account.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Chr>\u003Cp>\u003Cem>Vectorhelm is execution software. It runs the rules you define on accounts you own and control. Nothing here is trading advice. Martingale and DCA ladders can lose more than the first order many times over, and no configuration of risk limits prevents losses.\u003C\u002Fem>\u003C\u002Fp>","TradingView DCA Bot vs Martingale: The Real Numbers","Run a TradingView alert as a DCA or Martingale ladder. The exposure at eight rungs, the bounce each needs to exit, and the one limit that stops a ladder.","7 min read",[49,52,55,58,61,64,67],{"id":50,"text":51},"section-0","What a ladder actually is",{"id":53,"text":54},"section-1","One setting, two strategies",{"id":56,"text":57},"section-2","What you set, and what each setting does to the maths",{"id":59,"text":60},"section-3","What the next alert does while a ladder is open",{"id":62,"text":63},"section-4","The limit that actually stops a ladder",{"id":65,"text":66},"section-5","The honest limitation",{"id":68,"text":69},"section-6","Before you run one",37,{"related":72},[73,100,128],{"id":74,"status":36,"publishedAt":75,"updatedAt":75,"author":38,"authorSlug":39,"coverId":9,"coverUrl":9,"ogImageUrl":9,"languageCode":40,"slug":76,"title":77,"excerpt":78,"body":79,"metaTitle":80,"metaDescription":81,"readingTime":47,"headings":82,"category":12,"midCtaAfterBlock":99},"e282d174-7f10-4302-9b07-1dc8a688c0f9","2026-10-12T18:43:00.000Z","prop-firm-copy-trading-rules","Prop Firm Copy Trading Rules: Self-Copy vs Third-Party","Copying your own trades between your own accounts is allowed almost everywhere. Copying anyone else's gets the account closed. Here's where firms draw the line, and how they see it.","\u003Cp>Two traders at the same firm, running the same copy setup, one gets paid and one gets terminated. The difference isn't the software. It's whose account the trades came from.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\u003Cstrong>Most forex prop firms allow copy trading between accounts you own, including accounts at other firms, and FTMO, FundingPips and Alpha Capital say so on their own pages. What they prohibit is any arrangement where trades from someone else's account land in yours, or yours land in theirs. The rules are written around ownership, not technology, and firms detect the difference from the trades themselves.\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Rules below were checked on each firm's own pages on 14 October 2026. They change often, and the firm's page is the only version that counts.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-0\" dir=\"ltr\">The one line every firm draws\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Your accounts, copied between themselves: allowed. Anyone else's account, in either direction: not.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">The reason is the same one behind every prop firm's EA rules. A firm's payout model assumes the funded traders on its book are making independent decisions. When one person's trades land in twenty accounts, the firm isn't funding twenty traders. It's funding one, twenty times, and all twenty win or lose together. Copying between your own accounts doesn't change that picture, because the firm already sized you as one trader with a capital cap. Copying from a stranger does.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Everything else in the rules follows from that.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-1\" dir=\"ltr\">What the firms actually say\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ctable style=\"min-width: 100px;\">\u003Ccolgroup>\u003Ccol style=\"min-width: 25px;\">\u003Ccol style=\"min-width: 25px;\">\u003Ccol style=\"min-width: 25px;\">\u003Ccol style=\"min-width: 25px;\">\u003C\u002Fcolgroup>\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Firm\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Copying between your own accounts\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Copying from or to someone else\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>The condition\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>FTMO\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Allowed, within the $400,000 maximum capital allocation per trader or strategy\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not permitted; holding accounts under separate registrations to get around the cap is also prohibited\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Total capital across all your accounts stays inside the cap\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>FundingPips\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Allowed. \"Copying trades between your own accounts in the same direction\" is permitted\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\"Copy trading between different users' accounts is strictly prohibited\"\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Your FundingPips account as the master for an external copier is fine; use the investor password, since \"using your main account password may trigger further investigation\"\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Alpha Capital\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Allowed under its copy-trading policy, on approval through support\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Account management by a third party is listed as a prohibited strategy\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Same strategy on two accounts counts against the $300,000 per-strategy cap unless trades open and close at different times\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Alpha Capital's definition is the one to read twice. Two $200k accounts trading EURUSD on the same signal are one $400k strategy, which breaches its $300k per-strategy limit. The same two accounts trading EURUSD with entries and exits at different times are two trade ideas. The firm defines a strategy by when it trades, not by what it's called.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-2\" dir=\"ltr\">How a firm tells self-copy from third-party\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">From the trades. Not from the software, and not from what you call it.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">A risk desk compares accounts in pairs and counts how often their trades match inside a short window: same symbol, same direction, entries within a second or two, identical stop and target distances, lot sizes that are exact multiples of each other because they came from the same risk percentage on standard account sizes. Past a threshold, the accounts are one cluster. The broker's server also records how each order was placed, by hand on desktop, from mobile, from the web terminal, or by an Expert Advisor.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Self-copy produces that cluster. So does third-party copy. What separates them is who owns the accounts in it. If every account in the cluster is registered to you, you're inside the rules and inside your capital cap. If the cluster spans several registrations, the firm has found exactly what the rule prohibits, and it doesn't matter whether the trades arrived through a copier, a shared EA, a Telegram channel or a friend with your login.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">That last case is the one traders underrate. Giving someone your credentials so they can trade your challenge is third-party account management, however you describe it, and it's the version firms terminate without discussion.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-3\" dir=\"ltr\">What a trade copier gets wrong on a funded account\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">A trade copier mirrors lots. Master opens 2.0 lots, every follower opens 2.0 lots, or a fixed multiple of it. That's the copy, and that's the problem.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Your $100k account and your $25k account have different daily limits, different drawdown floors, and often different rules entirely if they're at different firms. A mirrored lot that's reasonable on the first is four times too big on the second. The copier doesn't know, because it's copying a trade, not running a strategy.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Then there's the limit itself. A copier has no account-level view. If the master account hits its daily loss and stops, the followers stop too, but only because the master stopped. If a follower account is closer to its own limit, nothing stops it first.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-4\" dir=\"ltr\">Self-copy, done the way the rules describe\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">On Vectorhelm, you don't copy trades. You run one strategy on several of your own accounts, and each account trades it as its own.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">The strategy defines size once, in terms that don't depend on the venue: a fixed amount per order, a percentage of balance, or a risk percentage against the stop. Each account turns that into its own order from its own balance, its own broker's contract size and lot step, and its own symbol name. Then two sets of limits apply on each account separately: the strategy's five (daily realized loss, daily realized profit, max drawdown, max open positions, max trades per day) and the account's five, with the day reset in that firm's timezone. The more restrictive limit wins, and a limit firing on one account never touches the others.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">So two accounts running the same strategy don't carry identical lots. They carry whatever each account's balance and limits allow, which is what a firm's rules are asking for.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">A strategy routes to any of your connected accounts: two at different firms, two at the same firm, or an MT5 account and a crypto exchange account together. Each route sizes in the venue's own units and uses the venue's own symbol name, so BTCUSD at the broker and BTCUSDT at the exchange are the same strategy. The one condition is that the symbol exists on both.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cfigure>\u003Cimg src=\"\u002Fmedia\u002F32fa9bea-ed5a-40b7-9fe2-d8e7505e818e-acfecc83.webp\" alt=\"Vectorhelm multi-account view with one strategy routed to a $100k prop firm account and a smaller account, each showing its own lot size and risk limits\" loading=\"lazy\">\u003Cfigcaption>One strategy, two accounts, two different lot sizes. Each account sizes from its own balance and runs inside its own limits, which is what a prop firm’s self-copy rule is asking for.\u003C\u002Ffigcaption>\u003C\u002Ffigure>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-5\" dir=\"ltr\">For signal providers\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">The question providers ask is how to let followers trade their signals without breaking the followers' prop rules. The answer is the same line the firms draw: distribute signals, not account access.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Vectorhelm never copies trades from one person's account into another's. A follower connects your signals as a source, TradingView alerts from your script or a Telegram channel, and runs their own strategy on their own account, with their own sizing and their own limits. You never touch their account and never see their credentials. Their account only receives orders that their own strategy and their own limits produced, which is the arrangement every firm's rule permits.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">There is no feature to publish a strategy and mirror it into followers' accounts. That's by design, because that feature is the thing the rules prohibit.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-6\" dir=\"ltr\">The honest limitation\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Self-copy inside a capital cap is allowed. Self-copy that pushes you past the cap isn't, and it's the easier mistake to make.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">FTMO's cap is $400,000 per trader or strategy, across all accounts, before scaling. Run one strategy on three $200k accounts and you're over it, however many of them are yours. Alpha Capital's cap is per strategy at $300,000, and the firm counts two accounts on one signal as one strategy. Before you route a strategy to a second account, add up the capital it will trade and check it against the firm's number.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">And firms don't publish where the detection threshold sits. Two of your own strategies that happen to enter on the same bar can look like one strategy to a review. Different timeframes and different entry logic keep them apart; a different name doesn't.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-7\" dir=\"ltr\">Before you connect a second account\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Add up the capital the strategy will trade across every account, and check it against each firm's cap.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">If the accounts are at different firms, read both firms' copy and EA rules. They differ, and the stricter one governs that account.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Use your investor password for anything that reads your account, never your main one.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Then run the strategy on both accounts in demo first and compare the lot sizes. If they're identical, you're copying trades; if they differ, each account is trading its own risk.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\u003Ca href=\"\u002Fearly-access\u002F\">Join the waitlist\u003C\u002Fa>. It's free, needs no card, and your invitation comes with a \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fplatform\u002Fdemo-accounts\u002F\">demo account\u003C\u002Fa> running the full risk engine, so you can route one strategy to two accounts and watch each one size and limit itself before a real challenge is involved. \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fplatform\u002Fmulti-account\u002F\">Multi-account\u003C\u002Fa> covers how routing works, and \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fsolutions\u002Fprop-firm-traders\u002F\">prop firm traders\u003C\u002Fa> covers the limits.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Chr>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\u003Cem>Vectorhelm is execution software. It runs the rules you define on accounts you own and control. Nothing here is trading advice, and no configuration of risk limits prevents losses. Prop firm rules change; verify against each firm's own published terms before relying on anything here.\u003C\u002Fem>\u003C\u002Fp>","Prop Firm Copy Trading Rules: What's Allowed in 2026","Prop firms that allow copy trading draw one line: your own accounts, yes; anyone else's, no. FTMO, FundingPips and Alpha Capital rules, and how firms tell.",[83,85,87,89,91,93,95,96],{"id":50,"text":84},"The one line every firm draws",{"id":53,"text":86},"What the firms actually say",{"id":56,"text":88},"How a firm tells self-copy from third-party",{"id":59,"text":90},"What a trade copier gets wrong on a funded account",{"id":62,"text":92},"Self-copy, done the way the rules describe",{"id":65,"text":94},"For signal providers",{"id":68,"text":66},{"id":97,"text":98},"section-7","Before you connect a second account",33,{"id":101,"status":36,"publishedAt":102,"updatedAt":102,"author":38,"authorSlug":39,"coverId":9,"coverUrl":9,"ogImageUrl":9,"languageCode":40,"slug":103,"title":104,"excerpt":105,"body":106,"metaTitle":107,"metaDescription":108,"readingTime":109,"headings":110,"category":31,"midCtaAfterBlock":127},"d7ec938f-306e-47ee-858c-13b900a18afe","2026-10-08T08:49:00.000Z","pineconnector-alternatives","PineConnector Alternatives in 2026: How Vectorhelm Compares","PineConnector moves an alert into MT5. Vectorhelm builds the strategy, trades MT5 and crypto, and stops the account at your limit. A side-by-side comparison.","\u003Cp>PineConnector does one job well: it takes a TradingView alert and turns it into an order on your MT5 account. That's all a bridge does.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Most traders looking for an alternative have run into the edges of that job. Their strategy only exists as Pine Script someone else wrote. Their crypto lives on a different platform. Nothing stops the account when the day goes wrong. And the performance numbers are in a spreadsheet they update by hand.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\u003Cstrong>PineConnector, AlgoWay and TradingConnector are bridges: they carry a signal from TradingView to an account. Vectorhelm is a trading workspace. It takes signals from TradingView, Telegram, webhooks or manual entry, builds strategies without code using an AI chat and a visual builder, runs them in four execution modes on MT5 and on Binance, Bybit and OKX, enforces risk limits at strategy and account level, and reports full performance analytics, all in one place.\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Competitor features and prices below were checked on each vendor's own website on 11 October 2026. Prices are what you pay on monthly billing, without annual discounts.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-0\" dir=\"ltr\">A bridge versus a workspace\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">A bridge assumes you already have everything else. A strategy, written in Pine Script. A separate tool for crypto. A way of stopping the account at your firm's limit, usually a rule you keep in your head. Somewhere to track whether any of it is working.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">That's four or five tools stitched together, each with its own login, its own failure mode, and no idea what the others are doing. The bridge in the middle sees one alert at a time. It doesn't know how much the account has lost today, how many strategies are running, or whether the crypto side just had a bad hour.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">A workspace puts all of it behind one set of controls. The strategy, the execution, the limits and the numbers live together, so the thing placing the trade is also the thing that knows whether the account can afford it.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-1\" dir=\"ltr\">The comparison\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ctable style=\"min-width: 125px;\">\u003Ccolgroup>\u003Ccol style=\"min-width: 25px;\">\u003Ccol style=\"min-width: 25px;\">\u003Ccol style=\"min-width: 25px;\">\u003Ccol style=\"min-width: 25px;\">\u003Ccol style=\"min-width: 25px;\">\u003C\u002Fcolgroup>\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Vectorhelm\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>PineConnector\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>AlgoWay\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>TradingConnector\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Signal sources\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>TradingView, Telegram, custom webhooks, manual entry\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>TradingView\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>TradingView, Telegram, MT5, cTrader, custom scripts\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>TradingView, Telegram\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Build strategies without code\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Visual builder, plus an AI chat that turns your description into conditions you can see and edit\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not listed; the trade is defined in the alert text\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not listed\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not listed\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Execution modes\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Signal, DCA, Grid, Martingale. External signals run as Signal or Martingale\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not listed\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not listed\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not listed\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>MT5\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Yes\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Yes\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Yes\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Yes\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Crypto exchanges\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Binance, Bybit, OKX, spot and perpetuals, with more coming\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not listed\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Many, with spot and futures varying by exchange\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Only through your MT5 broker's symbols\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Strategy-level risk limits\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Daily loss, trades per day, max open positions, drawdown\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not listed\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not listed\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not listed\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Account-level risk limits\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Daily loss, trades per day, max open positions, drawdown, across every strategy\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not offered\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not listed\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not listed\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>When a limit is hit\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>You choose: pause or stop\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>No limit to hit\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>No limit to hit\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>No limit to hit\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>When the connection drops\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Account pauses; a breach during the gap is enforced on reconnect\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>No limit to hold\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>No limit to hold\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>No limit to hold\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Analytics\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>P&L, win rate, profit factor, max drawdown, expectancy, per-strategy contribution, equity curve, drawdown chart\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Net profit, current drawdown, profit factor, balance and equity charts\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Trade metrics and logs\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not listed\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Accounts in one workspace\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Many accounts and strategies, MT5 and crypto together\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Up to 5 MT5 accounts (Pro)\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Alerts cloned to up to 3 accounts\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Multiple MetaTraders on higher tiers\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Demo account included\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Hosted sandbox with the full risk engine, no broker needed\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not provided; use your broker's demo\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not provided\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not provided\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Hosted MT5\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Coming Q1 2027, connector preinstalled, one click\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Yes (Edge)\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>VPS sold separately\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Not listed\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Price (monthly billing)\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>$29 \u002F $69 \u002F $129\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>$59–$199 (Core $69 after launch pricing)\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>$7 per MT5 route, $9 per TradingView route, $69 all-in-one\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>$14.99–$299\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\"Not listed\" means the feature isn't mentioned on the vendor's own website as of the check date.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-2\" dir=\"ltr\">What you get with Vectorhelm\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Ch3 dir=\"ltr\">Build the strategy yourself, without code\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Describe what you want in the AI chat: the entry, the exit, the filters, the timeframe. It becomes conditions in the \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fplatform\u002Fstrategy-builder\u002F\">strategy builder\u003C\u002Fa>, laid out visually so you can see exactly what will trade and change any part of it. No Pine Script, no syntax, no waiting on a developer. Templates open the same way, fully editable, so a starting point becomes your own strategy rather than the same one everyone else downloaded.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">With a bridge, your strategy is whatever Pine script you have. If you didn't write it, you can't change it.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 dir=\"ltr\">Four ways to execute\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Every strategy you build can run as a single \u003Cstrong>Signal\u003C\u002Fstrong> trade, a \u003Cstrong>DCA\u003C\u002Fstrong> sequence that adds to a position at set intervals, a \u003Cstrong>Grid\u003C\u002Fstrong> that works a price range, or a \u003Cstrong>Martingale\u003C\u002Fstrong> ladder. Signals from TradingView or Telegram can run as straight Signal trades or as a Martingale sequence, with your limits wrapped around it either way. \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fplatform\u002Fexecution-modes\u002F\">Execution modes\u003C\u002Fa> are set on the strategy, not hand-coded into an alert.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 dir=\"ltr\">Risk limits at two layers\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Each strategy has its own limits: daily loss, trades per day, maximum open positions and drawdown. The account has the same four above all of them, so one strategy having a bad morning can't spend the whole account's budget while the others keep trading. When a limit is reached, you decide whether that pauses trading or stops it.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">On a funded account the daily limit is measured the way your firm measures it: on equity as your broker reports it, with floating losses, swap and commission included. You set the timezone it resets in, so it can match midnight Central European time for FTMO or your broker's server midnight for FundedNext, and choose whether the day starts from balance or equity. That's what \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fplatform\u002Frisk-management\u002F\">account-level risk management\u003C\u002Fa> means in practice, and it's the piece every bridge on this page leaves to you.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 dir=\"ltr\">Limits that hold through a disconnect\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">When the link to your terminal drops, the account is paused and nothing new opens. Open positions keep their stop loss and take profit, which are real orders at your broker. Signals that fire during the gap are discarded rather than fired late at a price your strategy never saw. When the link returns, Vectorhelm re-reads the account from your broker, the broker's record wins any disagreement, and if the daily limit was breached in the gap, the account halts before it trades again.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 dir=\"ltr\">One signal, every account, the right size\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">A PineConnector alert carries the trade's details in its text. A Vectorhelm alert only says what to do, and size, stop, target and trailing come from the strategy. So one TradingView alert can trade a $100k funded account and a $5k crypto account, each at its own size and inside its own limits, from \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fplatform\u002Fmulti-account\u002F\">one workspace\u003C\u002Fa>.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 dir=\"ltr\">Numbers you don't have to build yourself\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">P&L, win rate, profit factor, maximum drawdown and expectancy, broken down by strategy so you can see which one is carrying the account and which is dragging it, with the equity curve and drawdown charted. \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fplatform\u002Fanalytics\u002F\">Analytics\u003C\u002Fa> are built from the same trades the platform placed, so there's nothing to export and reconcile.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch3 dir=\"ltr\">A demo account before any money moves\u003C\u002Fh3>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Every invitation comes with a \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fplatform\u002Fdemo-accounts\u002F\">demo account\u003C\u002Fa> hosted by Vectorhelm, running the same risk engine as a live account. No broker or exchange needed. Build a strategy, point an alert at it, set your firm's limits, and watch a limit refuse a trade before anything touches a funded account.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-3\" dir=\"ltr\">The others, briefly\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\u003Cstrong>PineConnector\u003C\u002Fstrong> has the deepest documentation of any bridge, supports MT4 as well as MT5, and its Edge plan now hosts the terminal for you. It handles partial closes and breakeven from the alert. It's built for one source, TradingView, and one destination type, MetaTrader. Its site lists no strategy builder, no DCA, Grid or Martingale modes, no crypto exchanges, and nothing that stops the account at a daily loss.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\u003Cstrong>AlgoWay\u003C\u002Fstrong> is the cheapest way to route a signal and reaches more destinations than anyone, including crypto exchanges. It's an execution route: no strategy builder, no execution modes and no account limits are listed.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\u003Cstrong>TradingConnector\u003C\u002Fstrong> is a long-running, low-cost bridge for TradingView and Telegram signals into MT4 and MT5. Like the others, it carries the signal and leaves strategy, risk and reporting to you.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">A $7 route that trades straight through your firm's daily loss rule is the most expensive tool on this page.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-4\" dir=\"ltr\">Who should switch\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\u003Cstrong>You trade a funded account.\u003C\u002Fstrong> You get account-level limits measured the way your firm measures them, holding through a disconnect. That's the gap every bridge here leaves open.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\u003Cstrong>You want to build or change your own strategy without code.\u003C\u002Fstrong> The AI chat and visual builder replace the Pine script you can't edit.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\u003Cstrong>You trade MT5 and crypto.\u003C\u002Fstrong> Both sit in one workspace, under the same risk controls, with one set of analytics.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\u003Cstrong>You want DCA, Grid or Martingale\u003C\u002Fstrong> with limits around them, not hand-built in alert syntax.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\u003Cstrong>You run several strategies or accounts\u003C\u002Fstrong> and want to see which one is actually making the money.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-5\" dir=\"ltr\">What switching involves\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Your Pine script and alert conditions can stay as they are. Replace the alert's webhook URL and message with the ones Vectorhelm generates for your strategy: copy, paste, nothing to edit. If your Pine strategy writes PineConnector commands into its alert message, swap those strings for Vectorhelm's action words once.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">On the MT5 side, install the connector in your terminal, attach it to any chart and enter a pairing code. It reconnects by itself after restarts. Then set your limits once, on the strategy and the account, and everything from then on runs inside them.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Or skip the Pine script entirely, and build the strategy in Vectorhelm.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-6\" dir=\"ltr\">Two things to know\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\u003Cstrong>Hosted MT5 arrives in Q1 2027.\u003C\u002Fstrong> It'll be one click, with the connector already installed, and you'll control everything from the Vectorhelm interface. Until then, MT5 runs on your own PC or a Windows VPS, not on MetaTrader's built-in virtual hosting, which doesn't allow the DLL imports the connector needs. Crypto accounts need nothing running on your side.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\u003Cstrong>MT5 only, hedging accounts.\u003C\u002Fstrong> MT4 and MT5 netting accounts aren't supported, and partial closes are done by hand rather than from an alert.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-7\" dir=\"ltr\">Try it before your next challenge\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Vectorhelm opens by invitation, in batches. \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fearly-access\u002F\">Join the waitlist\u003C\u002Fa>. It's free and needs no card, and your invitation arrives with a demo account running the full risk engine, with every limit available from day one rather than held back for a higher plan.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\u003Ca href=\"\u002Fhow-it-works\u002F\">How it works\u003C\u002Fa> walks through the full path from signal to order, and \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fpricing\u002F\">pricing\u003C\u002Fa> shows what each plan includes at $29, $69 or $129 a month, with a free trial on Pro. There's an overview for \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fsolutions\u002Ftradingview\u002F\">TradingView users\u003C\u002Fa>, for \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fsolutions\u002Fprop-firm-traders\u002F\">prop firm traders\u003C\u002Fa> and for \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fintegrations\u002Fmetatrader-5\u002F\">MT5\u003C\u002Fa>.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Chr>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\u003Cem>Vectorhelm is execution software. It runs the rules you define on accounts you own and control. Nothing here is trading advice, and no configuration of risk limits prevents losses. Competitor features and prices were checked on each vendor's own site on 11 October 2026, at monthly-billing rates, and change often; check them before buying.\u003C\u002Fem>\u003C\u002Fp>","PineConnector Alternatives: How Vectorhelm Compares","PineConnector alternatives compared: Vectorhelm vs PineConnector, AlgoWay and TradingConnector on strategy building, risk limits, crypto and price.","9 min read",[111,113,115,117,119,121,123,125],{"id":50,"text":112},"A bridge versus a workspace",{"id":53,"text":114},"The comparison",{"id":56,"text":116},"What you get with Vectorhelm",{"id":59,"text":118},"The others, briefly",{"id":62,"text":120},"Who should switch",{"id":65,"text":122},"What switching involves",{"id":68,"text":124},"Two things to know",{"id":97,"text":126},"Try it before your next challenge",93,{"id":129,"status":36,"publishedAt":130,"updatedAt":130,"author":38,"authorSlug":39,"coverId":9,"coverUrl":9,"ogImageUrl":9,"languageCode":40,"slug":131,"title":132,"excerpt":133,"body":134,"metaTitle":135,"metaDescription":136,"readingTime":137,"headings":138,"category":12,"midCtaAfterBlock":157},"39d4e172-4a71-4c7c-88b7-05cf8559fa68","2026-10-06T09:00:00.000Z","prop-firms-third-party-eas","Why Prop Firms Turned Against Third-Party EAs","Three hundred traders running the same EA aren't three hundred traders to a risk desk. They're one, and the rules that ask for your source code exist because of it.","\u003Cp>A marketplace EA sells to three hundred traders. Each of them buys a $100,000 challenge and runs it. To each trader it's one account and one bet.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">To the firm's risk desk it's one trader with thirty million dollars.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\u003Cstrong>Prop firms restrict third-party EAs because hundreds of accounts running the same EA behave like a single account. They enter on the same tick, stop out at the same price and ask for payouts in the same week. Per-strategy capital caps, \"distinct strategy\" rules and source-code requirements all do one job: make the firm size a strategy once, rather than once for every account it has been copied to.\u003C\u002Fstrong>\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">None of this means firms dislike automation. Several allow it outright. What they've stopped accepting is the same automation, many times over, sold as if it were many traders.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-0\" dir=\"ltr\">What does a risk desk actually look at?\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Not your account. The book.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">A desk's main screen shows net exposure per symbol: every open position across every account, added up into one live number per instrument. Individual traders barely move it. When news hits, hundreds of people buy EURUSD, but their orders arrive spread over seconds and minutes, at different sizes, with stops all over the chart. The number drifts.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Three hundred copies of one EA don't drift. Most EAs make their decision on the close of a bar, so every copy acts on the first price of the next one. Orders from three hundred logins land within the same second or two, and the net position in that symbol jumps in a single step. On the screen it looks exactly like one client sending one order for the sum of everyone's lots.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-1\" dir=\"ltr\">How does a firm tell copies from coincidence?\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">By the combination, repeated. Plenty of people buy the same pair at the same moment, so no single sign gives it away.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">What does give it away is the same set of things happening trade after trade:\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul dir=\"ltr\">\u003Cli>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Entries bunched within a second or two,\u003C\u002Fstrong> on the same symbol, in the same direction\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Identical stop and target distances,\u003C\u002Fstrong> to the point\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>Lot sizes that are the same fraction of each balance.\u003C\u002Fstrong> EAs usually size by risk percent, and prop accounts come in standard sizes, so a 10k, a 50k and a 100k account produce lots that are exact multiples of each other\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cp>\u003Cstrong>The same EA identifier,\u003C\u002Fstrong> the magic number an EA stamps on its orders, and often the same order comment\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">The broker's server stores the magic number and comment with every order. It also records how each order was placed: by hand on the desktop terminal, from the mobile app, from the web terminal, or by an Expert Advisor.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">The software firms buy to watch for this compares accounts in pairs, counting how often their trades match inside a short window. Past a threshold, the matched accounts are treated as one cluster, and often as one trader. The vendors describe it openly in their own marketing. PropForge lists copy-trade detection by trade timing and entry and exit pattern matching across accounts. FXPropTech's published guidance says matching symbols and timing alone isn't enough evidence, and that stronger detection also compares stop and target placement, position-size ratios and whole trading histories.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-2\" dir=\"ltr\">Why the exit is where it costs the firm\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">The stop or target sits at the same price on all three hundred accounts, so they all close on the same tick.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">A losing day is three hundred breaches at once. A winning month is three hundred payout requests at once, all generated by one strategy.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">That second case is the one the rules are written for. A firm prices its payouts on the assumption that funded traders' results are independent: some up, some down, and over a month it averages out. Copies don't average. They're one bet placed three hundred times, and when it wins, it wins everywhere.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">A per-strategy capital cap measures exactly that. The firm is sizing a strategy, not a trader, however many accounts the strategy has been spread across.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-3\" dir=\"ltr\">How the rules changed\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Firm by firm the wording differs. The target is the same.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ctable style=\"min-width: 75px;\">\u003Ccolgroup>\u003Ccol style=\"min-width: 25px;\">\u003Ccol style=\"min-width: 25px;\">\u003Ccol style=\"min-width: 25px;\">\u003C\u002Fcolgroup>\u003Ctbody>\u003Ctr>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Firm\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>What the rule says\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fth>\u003Cth colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>What it's aimed at\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fth>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>FTMO\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Capital capped at $400,000 per trader or per strategy across all accounts. Warns that a third-party EA may already be used by other traders, which can mean being denied a funded account\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>One strategy spread across many traders\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>FundedNext\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Each EA must use a distinct strategy, with no identical trades across accounts within FundedNext. $300,000 maximum per EA strategy, plus an EA fee. Tools that only adjust stops, targets or lot size count as EAs\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Identical strategies across accounts\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Alpha Capital\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>EAs allowed only for risk management and trade assistance; fully automated EAs aren't approved. $300,000 maximum per trading strategy\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Automation as a tool, not as the trader\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>FundingPips\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Third-party EAs only \"strictly as a trade or risk manager.\" Your own EA may be fully automated with proof of ownership\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Who wrote the strategy\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003Ctr>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>The5ers\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>\"The trader must own the source code of the EA\"\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003Ctd colspan=\"1\" rowspan=\"1\">\u003Cp>Who wrote the strategy\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Ftd>\u003C\u002Ftr>\u003C\u002Ftbody>\u003C\u002Ftable>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Each is a reasonable answer to the same problem, and a firm that restricts automation isn't making a worse product. Its payout model depends on independent outcomes, and third-party automation is the quickest way to lose them. Those firms are simply not compatible with it.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Alpha Capital's definition of a strategy is the most revealing line in the set. On its help centre, the same trader may trade EURUSD and GBPUSD on two accounts \"as long as the trades are opened and closed at different times, essentially making them different trade ideas.\" A strategy is defined by when it trades, not by what it's called.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-4\" dir=\"ltr\">Why do firms ask for source code?\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Because a compiled EA proves nothing about who wrote it.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">FundingPips says it directly: a compiled file on its own is not proof of ownership, and it asks for the uncompiled source instead. The5ers requires that the trader own the source code of any EA they run. A source file is evidence that the logic exists in one place, yours, rather than in three hundred downloads from the same marketplace page.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">If you built your own strategy, the practical point is to keep the record of building it. That's what the firm will ask for, and it's much easier to produce on the day than to reconstruct afterwards.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-5\" dir=\"ltr\">What actually makes a strategy distinct?\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Its behaviour. Not its labels.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Changing the lot size, the magic number, the order comment or the name changes nothing a risk desk looks at. The entries, exits and sizing logic are exactly what they were, and the account still lands in the same cluster.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">What does change it:\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cul dir=\"ltr\">\u003Cli>\u003Cp>Entry logic and the conditions behind it\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cp>Timeframe\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cp>Filters\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cp>The session you trade\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003Cli>\u003Cp>How the stop and target are placed and managed\u003C\u002Fp>\u003C\u002Fli>\u003C\u002Ful>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">There's a simple test. Run your version and the original side by side on demo for a few weeks. If they take different trades at different times, you have a different strategy. If they enter and exit together, you have the same one with a new name.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Adding a random delay or varying the lot size to hide a shared EA doesn't pass that test either. It's the same strategy, smeared slightly, and surveillance compares whole histories rather than single trades. It's also exactly what these rules exist to catch.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-6\" dir=\"ltr\">Building from a template\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">On Vectorhelm, every template opens fully editable in the \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fplatform\u002Fstrategy-builder\u002F\">strategy builder\u003C\u002Fa>: entry and exit conditions, timeframes, filters, size, stops and targets, with AI-assisted building to help turn it into your own version. If a strategy is still identical to its template when you launch it, it's flagged as an unmodified template, and you're asked to make it your own before it trades, with an explanation of why that matters on a funded account.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">The flag can tell that something changed. It can't tell that the strategy now trades differently. That judgement is the one in the section above, and it's yours.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Building your own logic also doesn't settle what your firm's EA policy says about the software that executes it. That's a separate question, and the firm is the one to answer it, in writing. The \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fblog\u002Fprop-firms\u002Fftmo-ea-rules\u002F\">FTMO version of that question\u003C\u002Fa> is covered in its own article.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-7\" dir=\"ltr\">The honest limitation\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Independent strategies can still collide.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Popular logic, a moving-average cross on the hourly close with a round-number stop, is used by thousands of traders who've never heard of each other. Their entries bunch on the same bar for the same reason three hundred copies of one EA do. At least one vendor's own published guidance says shared timing alone shouldn't count as proof of copying, and that a review score shouldn't fail an account automatically. But no firm publishes where its line sits, so there's no way to know in advance how close is too close.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">The more common your logic, the more your account looks like other people's. That's worth knowing before you build a strategy on the first setup every YouTube channel teaches.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Rules change, too. The policies above were checked on each firm's own pages on 8 October 2026, and EA policies are among the most frequently revised rules in this industry.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Ch2 id=\"section-8\" dir=\"ltr\">Before you put an EA on a funded account\u003C\u002Fh2>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">If you bought it, assume other people are running it, and read your firm's per-strategy cap and EA rules with that in mind.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Change the logic, not the labels.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Keep proof that you built it.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">Ask the firm in writing whether your setup is allowed, and keep the reply with a date on it.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">We're building \u003Ca href=\"\u002Fsolutions\u002Fprop-firm-traders\u002F\">risk enforcement for funded accounts\u003C\u002Fa> with strategies you build yourself, starting from templates that are meant to be changed. It isn't open yet. Early access is here if you want it when it is.\u003C\u002Fp>\u003Chr>\u003Cp dir=\"ltr\">\u003Cem>Vectorhelm is execution software. It runs the rules you define on accounts you own and control. Nothing here is trading advice, and no configuration of risk limits prevents losses. Prop firm rules change; verify against each firm's own published terms before relying on anything here.\u003C\u002Fem>\u003C\u002Fp>","Why Prop Firms Want Your EA's Source Code","Why prop firms ask for EA source code and cap capital per strategy: what a risk desk sees when hundreds of accounts run the same EA, and what changes it.","8 min read",[139,141,143,145,147,149,151,153,154],{"id":50,"text":140},"What does a risk desk actually look at?",{"id":53,"text":142},"How does a firm tell copies from coincidence?",{"id":56,"text":144},"Why the exit is where it costs the firm",{"id":59,"text":146},"How the rules changed",{"id":62,"text":148},"Why do firms ask for source code?",{"id":65,"text":150},"What actually makes a strategy distinct?",{"id":68,"text":152},"Building from a template",{"id":97,"text":66},{"id":155,"text":156},"section-8","Before you put an EA on a funded account",38,{"categories":159},[160,161,162,163,164,165,166],{"slug":6,"sort":7,"name":8,"description":9,"metaTitle":9,"metaDescription":9,"articles":10},{"slug":12,"sort":10,"name":13,"description":9,"metaTitle":9,"metaDescription":9,"articles":14},{"slug":16,"sort":17,"name":18,"description":9,"metaTitle":9,"metaDescription":9,"articles":10},{"slug":20,"sort":21,"name":22,"description":9,"metaTitle":9,"metaDescription":9,"articles":17},{"slug":24,"sort":14,"name":25,"description":9,"metaTitle":9,"metaDescription":9,"articles":7},{"slug":27,"sort":28,"name":29,"description":9,"metaTitle":9,"metaDescription":9,"articles":7},{"slug":31,"sort":32,"name":33,"description":9,"metaTitle":9,"metaDescription":9,"articles":7},1792269977330]